American Samizdat

Wednesday, December 17, 2008. *
William Greider knows the way around the filibuster. Make it 55 votes not 60 for cloture. I learned from this article that you can do this with a simple majority vote in the US Senate. Of course, why didn't they do it last session? That would have helped the country, lots and lots probably. I really think this is essential if the Democrats are going to do anything. I just see this happy confluence of corporate dems and corporate republicans doing a lot of bi partisan "things" that I'm really going to hate. Lots. Related: This is also related to these two stories here and here.

If the Democratic Party intends to get serious about governing, it can start by disabling the Republican filibuster that gives the minority party in the Senate a virtual veto over anything it wants to kill. The chatter in Washington assumes that since Democrats failed to gain a sixty-seat majority, there's nothing they can do. But that's not true. Democrats can change the rules and remove a malignant obstacle from the path of our new president. Given the emergency conditions facing the nation, why should Mitch McConnell and his right-wing colleagues get to decide what the Senate may vote on?

This proposition disturbs the happy talk about the "postpartisan" politics Barack Obama has inspired. But let's get real. McConnell is making nice for the moment, having survived his re-election scare in Kentucky. But he will use the filibuster to stymie the new Democratic administration whenever it looks to him like a political opportunity for Republicans. Thanks mainly to McConnell, the 110th Congress of 2007-08 set a new record--138 cloture motions to limit debate and head off filibusters. That is double the level of ten years ago. Who really believes McConnell will voluntarily give up his starring role as Senator No?

Labels: ,

posted by Philip Shropshire at 11:52 PM
Post a Comment

Site Meter

Creative Commons License